Date: 2008-06-09 04:21 pm (UTC)
One could also argue that characterizing people who want casual sexual relationships as commitment-phobic and non-safer-sex-practicing is both prejudicial and non-factual. At least, I would certainly argue so, for the sake of the longstanding relationship commitments I have with two partners who also engage in casual sexual relationships, and whose safer sex practices are beyond reproach.

Here's why *I* care: I worry that when it comes time for large-scale political battles, like formalizing financial commitments for groups larger than two, or simply guaranteeing the standard parental rights for adults audacious enough to have non-standard romantic or sexual relationships... we'll all be here infighting over whether having had a non-romantic sexual relationship last year makes you too immoral to sign our petition.

In any case, I think we're the only ones for it to possibly reflect badly to. The argument "we're not just having sex; we're having relationships" IME doesn't work well for convincing strictly-monogamy-minded people that polyamory is ethical; from my experience, their insurmountable issue with it is not generally sex outside of relationships, but simultaneous sexual relationships, whether casual or committed.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

.

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags